I read an interesting article recently, How Do You Create an Internet of Things Workforce?, that was published by the IEEE Computer Society. The gist of the article was that given the significant increase in the development of IoT applications and analytics, it was time to create a separate engineering discipline designed to cover the specific knowledge necessary to build "reliable, efficient, and safe" cyber physical (CPS) or IoT systems. Simply adding one or two IoT or CPS courses to an existing program, the authors argued, was not sufficient enough for students to thoroughly understand the reasons why IoT and CPS are different than existing engineering disciplines.
The authors cited a good example to make their case:
“There are also CPS/IoT applications for healthcare with the goal of improving a patient’s treatment regime. For example, the closed-loop insulin delivery system connecting a glucose monitor to an insulin pump can continuously alter the amount of insulin dosed to a patient to assist in managing the patient’s blood sugar. In fact, any product that continuously monitors patient activity to improve treatment would be an effective IoT application. Imagine how much more effective treatment could be for a Parkinson’s patient when a physician has more than a static snapshot from an office visit exam. With months of data and information, the physician could determine a more effective treatment plan.”
An important takeaway from their example is that an engineering or computer science curriculum developed and/or updated 10 or even 5 years ago would not adequately educate students on the recent and rapid developments in artificial intelligence, machine learning, sensors and the many other sophisticated technologies inherent in future IoT and CPS applications. Furthermore, standard engineering curricula most likely would not adequately address the safety and data security vulnerabilities that are being uncovered and compromised in the cyber-world on a daily basis.
Human safety and data security are key elements in the quest to build “reliable, efficient, and safe” CPS and IoT systems. While I fully agree with the author’s premise, I would add that security would be a major component to any engineering curricula designed to train the new breed of IoT and CPS engineers. And as the authors note, simply adding an IoT or CPS course to existing engineering degree programs is not adequate. Cyber-security is more than an add-on course or two, but rather a core component of an entire program.
This is where the term “security-by-design” comes in. A security-by-design approach to software and hardware development places the emphasis on building security into the products from the start vs. an afterthought in development. One of the major challenges of IoT security is the fact that security has not typically been considered in product design for devices that have not traditionally been Internet enabled and accessible via a network. While in a typical industrial environment characterized by long machine lifecycles, retrofits in the brown field are still significantly important, as all other green field applications require a plan of attack right from the start.
This is also true for the Industrial Internet of Things, where the emergence of smart electrical grids, connected healthcare devices and hospitals, intelligent transport, smart factories and other types of cyber-physical systems have created large scale attack surfaces.
Hopefully, academia will keep up with the rapidly evolving environment where millions of connected devices are the norm and adequately train the next generation of safety-conscious IoT and CPS engineers. There is much to be learned on many fronts. One document I propose for any engineering curricula is the Industrial Internet Security Framework published by the Industrial Internet Consortium (IIC). The document is a collaborative work containing the cybersecurity wisdom of IIC members from over 25 different organizations and provides guidance for improving organizational approaches, processes and the use of technologies for creating a trustworthy system. It is an important starting point to understanding the security challenges brought on by the IoT and CPS.
Wibu-Systems Global Marketing Director – IIC Marketing WG Co-Chair
Daniela is a marketing veteran who has dedicated more than twenty years of her career to the service of world-leading IT security vendors. Throughout her journey in this field, she has covered executive positions in international sales, product marketing, and product management and acquired comprehensive knowledge of both digital rights management solutions and authentication technologies. Working from the German headquarters of Wibu-Systems, she is currently leading both corporate and channel marketing activities, innovating penetration strategies, and infusing her multinational team with a holistic mindset.